Prediction of Mirza Basic [507th] vs Gian Marco Ortenzi [] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L W W L
Form
W W L W L W L L W LHead-2-Head: Basic 2 - 0 Ortenzi
They have played 4 sets in total, with Basic winning 4 and Ortenzi winning 0. The last match between Basic and Ortenzi was at the M15 Antalya, 27-02-2025, Second, Clay with Mirza Basic getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mirza Basic | 2 |
| Gian Marco Ortenzi | 0 |
| Basic | Stats | Ortenzi |
|---|---|---|
| 68% (13-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 57% (8-6) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 507 | Ranking | N/A |
| 74 | Highest Rank | |
| 33 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 11 | Titles | 0 |
| 57% (502-384) | Career Total W/L | 59% (146-102) |
| $478,883 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Mirza Basic
Player
Gian Marco Ortenzi
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Gian Marco Ortenzi
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 8 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:21:0 | Average Match Time | 1:21:0 |
| 64% (66/103) | 1st Serve % | 66% (69/104) |
| 76% (50/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (35/69) |
| 51% (19/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (16/35) |
| 60% (9/15) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 51% (53/104) | Return Points Win % | 33% (34/103) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Mirza Basic vs Gian Marco Ortenzi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Basic 2 - 0 Ortenzi
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Basic has won 40.1% of points on their second serve, while Ortenzi has won 41.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Basic, in recent form, has won 46.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ortenzi has won 45.42%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.27% and 32.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Basic has saved 41.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ortenzi has saved 49.31% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Basic has won 62.9% of matches played (W/L 39/ 23), with Ortenzi winning 57.14% (W/L 28/ 21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Basic has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 141/ 104), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 14/ 20). Ortenzi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 119/ 78), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Basic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.39% of matches (W/L 31/ 15), where as Ortenzi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 28/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Basic winning 2 times and Ortenzi being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Basic winning 4 and Ortenzi winning 0. The last match between Basic and Ortenzi was at the M15 Antalya, 27-02-2025, Second, Clay with Mirza Basic getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Basic and Ortenzi have played a deciding set 0 times, with Basic winning 0 times and Ortenzi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Basic winning 0, and Ortenzi 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Basic has played against opponents with an average rank of 337.29 while Ortenzi has played against players with an average rank of 89.94.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Basic has won 36% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ortenzi has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Basic has converted 27.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ortenzi has converted 36.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Mirza Basic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Cristian Jianu
Player
Mirza Basic
88%
(
61 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Michael Vrbensky
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
76%
(
34 of
45)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Martin Klizan
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mili Poljicak
Player
Mirza Basic
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Mak Mikovic
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Samuel Martinez Arjona
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alexander Weis
Player
Mirza Basic
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
51%
(
18 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Niccolo Catini
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Nerman Fatic
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
39%
(
12 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Gian Marco Ortenzi
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Gian Marco Ortenzi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Aljaz Jeran
Player
Gian Marco Ortenzi
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alessandro Bellifemine
Player
Gian Marco Ortenzi
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
73%
(
59 of
81)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 5-7 11-9 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Nagel
Player
Gian Marco Ortenzi
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
66 of
93)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
44 of
66)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gian Marco Ortenzi
Player
Gorazd Srbljak
76%
(
55 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mirza Basic
Player
Gian Marco Ortenzi
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gian Marco Ortenzi
Player
Alessandro Battiston
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-7(3) 10-7 | H2H | |||
view more
Where To Watch Basic vs Ortenzi?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Basic Vs Ortenzi is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (502/384) | Win/Loss | 59% (146/102) |
| 55% (1122/926) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (318/232) |
| 51% (10262/9687) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2811/2365) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 3141 | Aces Total | 173 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1186 | Total Double Faults | 381 |
| 1:6:21 | Average Match Time | 1:3:39 |
| 563.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 115.43 |
| 61% (27615/45477) | 1st Serve % | 69% (6693/9735) |
| 71% (19703/27615) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (4080/6693) |
| 52% (9302/17860) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1393/3042) |
| 41% (1643/4045) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (488/1060) |
| 37% (16961/45665) | Return Points Win % | 43% (4100/9547) |
| 57% (481/849) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (144/243) |
| 57% (13/23) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (180/314) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (23/47) |
| 57% (146/258) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (31/59) |
| 87% (472/410) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (150/131) |
| 13% (472/61) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (150/19) |
| 22% (413/91) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (98/15) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Mirza Basic
View full predicted draw for Basic
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
